"The days of a general
physician, family practitioner or general
surgeon effectively and efficiently managing
patients with venous thromboembolism may be
coming to an end” according to Drs Spryopolous
of Lovelace Heath Systems and Haire of the
University of Nebraska.
It is interesting that in
the UK the government are pushing the
management of this type of disease into
primary care. Will this eventually be
reversed?
The science of thrombotic
disorders is reaching a revolutionary phase in
its development with new paradigms of
diagnosis, prophylaxis, acute treatment and
chronic management. In addition a deeper
understanding of the genotypic and phenotypic
mechanisms in thrombophilic states is
increasing.

Anticoagulation is rapidly
becoming a ‘glamour’ topic!
Improved diagnostic decision modeling,
including the use of newer diagnostic
modalities such as plasma quantitative d-dimer
testing [1-3], spiral computerized tomography
scanning [4,5], and magnetic resonance direct
thrombin imaging (MRDTI) [6] may approach the
sensitivities and specificities of the
venographic "gold standard" and ultimately
obviate the need for invasive testing.
New randomized controlled data supporting
in-patient thromboprophylaxis for well-defined
medical at-risk patient groups and extended
thromboprophylaxis in high risk surgical
groups such as cancer and orthopedic patients
are providing complex disease management
guideline approaches in the area of VTE
prophylaxis.
Lastly, the field of antithrombotic therapy
has reached explosive levels within the
pharmaceutical industry's drug pipeline, with
ever increasing numbers of agents undergoing
Phase Il and III clinical trials.
They argue the case for the need and the
formation of a specialist service to sit along
side the current anticoagulation clinics
headed by a clinical thrombologist!
For more information see the Journal
of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 15(3), 227-232,
2003